The Chicago Bears entered the 2025 NFL Draft on April 24 with seven picks over the three-day draft.

The Bears made Michigan tight end Colston Loveland their top pick at No. 10, giving new head coach Ben Johnson and quarterback Caleb Williams a big weapon for the offense. Interestingly, they passed on Penn State tight end Tyler Warren, whom many mock drafters had pegged to Chicago.

On Day 2, they added another dynamic pass catcher in Missouri wide receiver Luther Burden III with the 39th pick. He’ll join DJ Moore and Rome Odunze in what is shaping up as a stellar receiving group. The Bears originally had the 41st pick, but they traded out of that spot with the Buffalo Bills. They received the Nos. 56, 62 and 109 picks for Nos. 41, 72 and 240.

With the 56th pick, they addressed the offensive line, taking Boston College tackle Ozzy Trapilo. The 6-foot-8, 316-pounder played right tackle in college, so it remains to be seen where the Bears will ultimately use him and Darnell Wright.

After adding three offensive players, the Bears finally gave defensive coordinator Dennis Allen someone to work with, choosing Texas A&M defensive tackle Shemar Turner at No. 62. Turner joins free-agent signee Grady Jarrett and returning players Gervon Dexter and Andrew Billings on the interior.

On Saturday, the Bears selected Maryland linebacker Ruben Hyppolite II. He brings a ton of speed to a position lacking depth after the departure of Jack Sanborn.

In the fifth round, the Bears chose cornerback Zah Frazier of Texas-San Antonio. Long, lean and fast, he should fit nicely in Allen’s defense.

With pick No. 195, they selected Michigan State offensive lineman Luke Newman, continuing to add depth up front. A two-time All-American at Holy Cross, Newman started at left guard for Michigan State last season.

The Bears wrapped up their draft by selecting Rutgers running back Kyle Monangai in the seventh round. That was seen as a major position of need behind D’Andre Swift and Roschon Johnson.

Round 1

No. 10: Colston Loveland, TE, Michigan

How he fits

Dane Brugler’s analysis

A three-year starter at Michigan, Loveland was a versatile tight end in head coach Sherrone Moore’s pro-style scheme, lining up primarily in the slot (47.6 percent of the time) and inline/wing (32.5 percent) as a junior. From the moment he arrived in Ann Arbor, he was one of the most talented players on the roster and made an immediate impact in his first two years, including as the Wolverines’ leading receiver in the 2023 national championship game. His final season was marred by injury and below-average quarterback play, but he still led the team in receiving in nine of the 10 games he played and set Michigan records for the tight end position.

With his speed and ball skills, Loveland can line up anywhere on the field and win as a quarterback-friendly, multilevel receiving threat. He isn’t a liability as a one-pop, get-in-the-way blocker but will struggle to sustain or control NFL edge defenders. Overall, Loveland doesn’t have the skill set for full-time inline responsibilities, but his dynamic movements, natural hands and football awareness should make him one of the primary targets in an NFL offense. His tools and upside are reminiscent of Zach Ertz.

Adam Jahns’ analysis

Grade: A

Round 2

No. 39: Luther Burden III, WR, Missouri

How he fits

Dane Brugler’s analysis

With his run-after-catch skills, Burden saw a high volume of quick-hitters and crossers, which showcased his any-direction burst and physicality to give defenders the shake. His route running is best described as a “work in progress” right now, but he appears unfazed when forced to flip his body and track/adjust to errant throws. Overall, Burden is still working on his undergrad degree in route setup and separation, but he holds a master’s in creating with the ball in his hands because of his explosive speed and competitive toughness. For an NFL team targeting a YAC weapon with upside to be more, he will be an appealing option early.

Kevin Fishbain’s analysis

Fantasy impact

No. 56: Ozzy Trapilo, OT, Boston College

How he fits

Dane Brugler’s analysis

Although he never had the chance to see his late father, Steve, play in the NFL, Trapilo has the same offensive line talent in his DNA, with the natural movements and technical control. He stays patient and under control in his pass sets and understands hand placement to maintain space between himself and rushers. He needs to be more consistent blocking low to high in the run game, but he quickly establishes body positioning to manipulate spacing and cut off defenders. Overall, Trapilo is a towering athlete and can be jarred at contact on occasion, but he has swing-tackle traits with his smooth weight distribution and the impressive strike timing he uses to consistently complete the mission. It wouldn’t be surprising to see him compete for starting right tackle reps as a rookie.

No. 62: Shemar Turner, DT, Texas A&M

How he fits

Dane Brugler’s analysis

With his active motor and body quickness, Turner finds ways to pierce gaps and affect the backfield action. He has a strong, explosive grip to snatch and displace blockers in the run game, although he can be a liability at times when he abandons his gap or fails to break down and finish. Much will be made of his overzealous tendencies, which draw attention from officials, but as one scout described him: “He’s the type you want on your side.” Overall, Turner needs to introduce more discipline to his play style, but he prides himself on being the aggressor and relies on his initial twitch, fierce hands and combative mentality to be a factor. He projects best as a penetrating one-gap tackle.

Round 4

No. 132: Ruben Hyppolite II, LB, Maryland

How he fits

Hyppolite adds depth to the Bears’ linebackers room and brings a ton of speed. He could also contribute on special teams. “They definitely told me that my ability to cover and ability to run is a great asset to have,” Hyppolite said.

Round 5

No. 169: Zah Frazier, CB, UTSA

How he fits

Frazier has good length (6-2) and speed (4.36 40) for the position. But he’s only 186 pounds. He set UTSA’s single-season interceptions record with six last season. It’s easy to see how he fits with Allen. “We brought him in for a 30-visit and this guy was unbelievable,” Bears director of player personnel Trey Koziol said. “Really self-aware. Had to take the long route to the NFL … but we absolutely loved having him in the building.”

Dane Brugler’s analysis

Frazier is a long, lean bump-and-run corner with the speed and coordination to cling to receivers and find the football, when his technique stays consistent. There isn’t much mystery why a team might feel he is worth the gamble on Day 3 of the draft.

Round 6

No. 195: Luke Newman, OL, Michigan State

How he fits

A two-time All-American at Holy Cross as a left tackle, Newman started at left guard for Michigan State last season. He’s expected to add depth on the interior of the Bears’ line.

Dane Brugler’s analysis

Newman will have a tough time controlling the point of attack against long-armed defensive linemen, but his movement skills, demeanor and durability should give him a chance to stand out in an NFL training camp.

Round 7

No. 233: Kyle Monangai, RB, Rutgers

How he fits

An ultra-productive back over the past two seasons for Rutgers, Monangai gives Johnson another option in the backfield. Barring a free-agent add, it’ll be D’Andre Swift as RB1 again, but Monangai has some solid traits (ball security, durability, between-the-tackles running). He totaled 707 scrimmage plays (669 rush attempts, 38 receptions) in his career at Rutgers and did not fumble a single time.

Dane Brugler’s analysis

Monangai lacks breakaway speed, but he can pick, slide and weave through the defense with shifty quickness and run toughness. His competitive profile and promising reps on passing downs should make him an effective utility back in the NFL.

Fantasy impact